3.0: The Case for CAGW is Weak

As far as I can tell, there are only 3 categories of evidence which support the CAGW Hypothesis:

(a)  It is possible to construct a simulation which is consistent with many historic aspects of the climate and which also predicts a lot of warming in response to increases in atmospheric CO2;

(b) Certain aspects of modern weather/climate are unprecedented; and

(c) Many prominent scientific bodies have endorsed and accepted the CAGW Hypothesis.

I will deal with each of these in turn.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: