The IPCC and Restaurant Bills

There has been some talk lately about an IPCC “mistake” in apparently predicting the melting of Himalayan glaciers by 2035.  Unsurprisingly, the alarmists excuse this, stating that “[l]ike all human endeavours, the IPCC is not perfect.”  http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2010/01/the-ipcc-is-not-infallible-shock/

However, I am reminded of mistakes I find in restaurant and other bills.  Why is it that 90% of these mistakes are in favor of the restaurant and against me? 

Is it a coincidence that this IPCC “mistake” just happened to support the alarmist viewpoint?

I don’t think so.  Even among those alarmists who are not intentionally engaging in fraud, it’s human nature to be much more careful in evaluating claims which go against their agenda than in evaluating claims which support it.  In the same way, many restaurants are much more careful to make sure everything you ordered goes on the bill than to make sure you don’t get billed for stuff you didn’t order.

The IPCC is pretty clearly biased in favor of the alarmist point of view which is good reason to be skeptical of the IPCC’s claims.  And yet in debates about global warming, alarmists consistently rely on the latest IPCC report as though its the bible of their Green Religion.

Advertisements

4 Responses to “The IPCC and Restaurant Bills”

  1. Paul Crowley Says:

    Revisions in the other direction, like the satellite data revision a few years ago, don’t make the news.

  2. brazil84 Says:

    Sir: I’m a little confused by your response. Are you talking about a revision made by the IPCC? Or something else? Can you give me a link or something so I know what you are talking about? Thanks!

  3. brazil84 Says:

    P.S. I did a couple google searches and did not find anything about the IPCC making a “mistake” in the other direction with respect to the sattelite temperature record.

    If your point is that the IPCC regularly makes “mistakes” in the other direction, please provides some examples and links. Thank you.

  4. brazil84 Says:

    Paul Crowley, since you have not substantiated your (apparent) claim, my conclusion is that you are probably just wrong. That my impression is correct that the IPCC generally makes its mistakes in favor of the warmist position. And that this shows the IPCC is biased.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: